CONFIDENTIAL PATENT POSITION REVIEW
PATENT POSITION18/856,095
LEVEL 1 — EXECUTIVE
Executive

WHY ILLUST?

Why this patent position has been mapped to the ILLUST platform.

The review examined publicly available ILLUST material against each component of the patent architecture. Publicly documented capability was identified across multiple components of that architecture — not in isolation, but along the same end-to-end sequence the patent describes.

Components of the patent architecture identified in public ILLUST material

1.a

GEOLOCATION

STRONG

1.b

DIGITAL ASSETS

STRONG

1.c

MAP DISCOVERY

STRONG

1.d

PHYSICAL PRESENCE

STRONG

1.e

AR

STRONG

1.f

MARKETPLACE

STRONG

1.g

DIGITAL OWNERSHIP

CONFIRMATION REQUIRED

PUBLIC EVIDENCE INDICATES CORRESPONDENCE ACROSS THE END-TO-END WORKFLOW

7

Major technical elements reviewed.

7

Elements with identified public evidence.

Full workflow

Location through to digital ownership, reviewed as one connected sequence.

View the strategic IP position

Basis for further evaluation

The breadth of publicly documented technical correspondence provides a basis for further confidential legal, technical and commercial evaluation.

No determination of infringement is made or implied, and no assertion is made that any licence is required. The review identifies areas of technical correspondence drawn from public material.

Patent Mapping Disclaimer

This presentation has been prepared for preliminary commercial and technical evaluation purposes. The analysis is based primarily on publicly available information and does not constitute a complete claim analysis, allegation of infringement, legal opinion or legal advice. References to technical correspondence indicate areas identified for further evaluation and should not be interpreted as a determination of infringement or legal liability. Certain technical operations cannot be established from public information and may require further confidential technical review. Patent prosecution status and claim scope should be independently confirmed with qualified patent counsel before reliance is placed upon this analysis.