PATENT POSITION & PROSECUTION TIMELINE
The chronology of the patent position, drawn from the public patent record. Dates are shown only where established; nothing is inferred.
14 APRIL 2022
Priority date
Australian priority filing establishing the earliest effective date of the disclosure.
13 APRIL 2023
International application filing
PCT/AU2023/050306, published as WO 2023/197041 A1.
—
U.S. application 18/856,095
United States national-phase application derived from the international application.
—
Publication — US 2025/0245933 A1
United States pre-grant publication containing the published claim set relied on in this review.
—
USPTO examination
Substantive examination of the United States application.
—
Notice of Allowance
The USPTO has indicated that claims are allowable. Final allowed claim language is being verified.
—
Proceeding toward grant
The application is proceeding toward a granted United States patent.
Priority date
14 April 2022
Publication
US 2025/0245933 A1
Status
Notice of Allowance / Proceeding Toward Grant
PORTFOLIO STRATEGY WINDOW
While an application remains pending, continuation or divisional filings supported by the original disclosure may remain available. Any specific timing is a matter for the prosecution record and qualified U.S. patent counsel.
Pending confirmation against USPTO prosecution record.
No continuation or divisional deadline is displayed as fact in this review. Any such timing is held internally and is subject to confirmation with qualified U.S. patent counsel.
Verification standard
Any date not established from the public record is shown as pending. Pending confirmation against USPTO prosecution record.
Patent Mapping Disclaimer
This presentation has been prepared for preliminary commercial and technical evaluation purposes. The analysis is based primarily on publicly available information and does not constitute a complete claim analysis, allegation of infringement, legal opinion or legal advice. References to technical correspondence indicate areas identified for further evaluation and should not be interpreted as a determination of infringement or legal liability. Certain technical operations cannot be established from public information and may require further confidential technical review. Patent prosecution status and claim scope should be independently confirmed with qualified patent counsel before reliance is placed upon this analysis.