CONFIDENTIAL PATENT POSITION REVIEW
PATENT POSITION18/856,095
ILLUST PATHWAYOVERVIEWSTRATEGIC POSITIONWHY ILLUSTTHE COMBINATIONPATENT POSITIONPROSECUTION TIMELINEILLUST MAPPINGCLAIM ANALYSISCLAIM ANATOMYSYSTEM CORRESPONDENCEEVIDENCEEVIDENCE TIMELINEEVIDENCE GAPSU.S. RELEVANCECORPORATE CONTROLSTRATEGIC VALUECOMMERCIAL PATHWAYSNEXT STAGE
System Correspondence

END-TO-END TECHNICAL CORRESPONDENCE

The patent architecture flow above, the publicly documented ILLUST workflow beneath. Select any ILLUST stage to open the underlying evidence supporting that correspondence.

Patent architecture

1

Position selected

1.a

2

Digital asset associated

1.b

3

Map generated / presented

1.c

4

User location determined

1.d

5

AR asset accessed

1.e

6

Marketplace transaction

1.f

7

Digital ownership / blockchain transfer

1.g

Illust publicly documented workflow

Stage 1 — 1.a

Patent architecture

A physical or geographic location, space or object reference is selected.

Illust publicly documented capability

Public material describes anchoring works and AR experiences to real-world positions via coordinates, geohashes and location anchors.

STRONG CORRESPONDENCE

Verification required — Exact selection UI and permitted location types to be confirmed.

Preliminary technical correspondence based on publicly available information.

Evidence classifications

DIRECT PUBLIC EVIDENCE

Public material directly describes the relevant technical operation.

STRONG CORRESPONDENCE

Multiple public sources demonstrate substantial technical correspondence.

REASONABLE CORRESPONDENCE

The public architecture appears consistent with the patent element but additional technical information is required.

TECHNICAL CONFIRMATION REQUIRED

Public information does not establish every relevant technical limitation.

Patent Mapping Disclaimer

This presentation has been prepared for preliminary commercial and technical evaluation purposes. The analysis is based primarily on publicly available information and does not constitute a complete claim analysis, allegation of infringement, legal opinion or legal advice. References to technical correspondence indicate areas identified for further evaluation and should not be interpreted as a determination of infringement or legal liability. Certain technical operations cannot be established from public information and may require further confidential technical review. Patent prosecution status and claim scope should be independently confirmed with qualified patent counsel before reliance is placed upon this analysis.