CONFIDENTIAL PATENT POSITION REVIEW
PATENT POSITION18/856,095
ILLUST PATHWAYOVERVIEWSTRATEGIC POSITIONWHY ILLUSTTHE COMBINATIONPATENT POSITIONPROSECUTION TIMELINEILLUST MAPPINGCLAIM ANALYSISCLAIM ANATOMYSYSTEM CORRESPONDENCEEVIDENCEEVIDENCE TIMELINEEVIDENCE GAPSU.S. RELEVANCECORPORATE CONTROLSTRATEGIC VALUECOMMERCIAL PATHWAYSNEXT STAGE
Claim Analysis

CLAIM-LEVEL TECHNICAL MAPPING

Each claim element is set against publicly documented ILLUST capability, the supporting evidence, technical commentary and the matters that cannot be determined from public information.

PUBLISHED CLAIM MAPPING — ALLOWED CLAIM VERIFICATION PENDING

The technical mapping presented in this section is based on the publicly available claims of U.S. Patent Publication US 2025/0245933 A1. The application has progressed to allowance. The final allowed claim language will be incorporated following verification against the USPTO prosecution record. Until that verification is complete, the claim mapping should be treated as a technical analysis of the published claim set rather than a representation of final allowed claim scope. Prosecution status

Technical interpretation

A seller or owner designates a selectable real-world position, space or physical object reference within the system.

Technical commentary

Mapping candidate is strong on public material; construction of 'selectable space' required.

ILLUST capability (publicly documented)

Creators publicly described as able to anchor assets and AR experiences at physical-world positions.

Supporting evidence

Verification required

Exact selection UI and permitted location types to be confirmed.

Patent Mapping Disclaimer

This presentation has been prepared for preliminary commercial and technical evaluation purposes. The analysis is based primarily on publicly available information and does not constitute a complete claim analysis, allegation of infringement, legal opinion or legal advice. References to technical correspondence indicate areas identified for further evaluation and should not be interpreted as a determination of infringement or legal liability. Certain technical operations cannot be established from public information and may require further confidential technical review. Patent prosecution status and claim scope should be independently confirmed with qualified patent counsel before reliance is placed upon this analysis.