PUBLISHED INDEPENDENT CLAIM — TECHNICAL BREAKDOWN
Each limitation is shown in its own right: the claim language, what it requires technically, the closest publicly documented ILLUST capability, the supporting evidence, and the resulting assessment.
PUBLISHED CLAIM MAPPING — ALLOWED CLAIM VERIFICATION PENDING
The technical mapping presented in this section is based on the publicly available claims of U.S. Patent Publication US 2025/0245933 A1. The application has progressed to allowance. The final allowed claim language will be incorporated following verification against the USPTO prosecution record. Until that verification is complete, the claim mapping should be treated as a technical analysis of the published claim set rather than a representation of final allowed claim scope.
Claim source in use
Built-in baseline — published application text · Publication US 2025/0245933 A1
The claim language reproduced below is the published application text. No allowed claim language has been inferred, paraphrased or generated. Once the allowed claim set is supplied to the claim source register, the allowed analysis becomes the primary commercial analysis and this published analysis is preserved as prosecution history.
Claim source registerLIMITATION 1.a
Published claim language
“receiving a selection of a physical or geographic location or space”
Plain-English technical meaning
A seller or owner designates a selectable real-world position, space or physical object reference within the system.
ELEMENT 1.a
Patent requirement
receiving a selection of a physical or geographic location or space
Public evidence
Creators publicly described as able to anchor assets and AR experiences at physical-world positions.
Technical interpretation
Mapping candidate is strong on public material; construction of 'selectable space' required.
Correspondence assessment
STRONG CORRESPONDENCELIMITATION 1.b
Published claim language
“associating a digital asset with the selected location”
Plain-English technical meaning
The system creates a persistent binding between asset record and location data (coordinates, geohash, anchor or geofence).
ELEMENT 1.b
Patent requirement
associating a digital asset with the selected location
Public evidence
GPS coordinates, geohashes, geofences and location anchors publicly described.
Technical interpretation
GeoSpatial Registry material is the primary public support.
Correspondence assessment
STRONG CORRESPONDENCELIMITATION 1.c
Published claim language
“generating a map identifying locations at which digital assets may be viewed”
Plain-English technical meaning
A map interface renders markers for the geographic positions of placed assets, enabling discovery.
ELEMENT 1.c
Patent requirement
generating a map identifying locations at which digital assets may be viewed
Public evidence
Google Maps-like interface and AR 'Mapplication' publicly described.
Technical interpretation
Public material describes functionality consistent with this element at a technical-architecture level.
Correspondence assessment
STRONG CORRESPONDENCELIMITATION 1.d
Published claim language
“determining physical presence of a user device at the location”
Plain-English technical meaning
Device location is evaluated against the associated location or geofence to condition access.
ELEMENT 1.d
Patent requirement
determining physical presence of a user device at the location
Public evidence
Public material describes navigation toward assets and proof-of-presence functionality.
Technical interpretation
Public material describes functionality consistent with this element at a technical-architecture level.
Correspondence assessment
STRONG CORRESPONDENCELIMITATION 1.e
Published claim language
“displaying the digital asset in augmented reality with the real-world environment”
Plain-English technical meaning
The asset is rendered through an AR camera view registered to the physical scene.
ELEMENT 1.e
Patent requirement
displaying the digital asset in augmented reality with the real-world environment
Public evidence
Browser-based AR rendering of works at physical locations.
Technical interpretation
Public material describes functionality consistent with this element at a technical-architecture level.
Correspondence assessment
STRONG CORRESPONDENCELIMITATION 1.f
Published claim language
“offering the digital asset for purchase or trade”
Plain-English technical meaning
Marketplace functions expose listing, offer, bidding or trade of the located asset.
ELEMENT 1.f
Patent requirement
offering the digital asset for purchase or trade
Public evidence
Marketplace, sale, bidding and purchase functions described in public terms.
Technical interpretation
Public material describes functionality consistent with this element at a technical-architecture level.
Correspondence assessment
STRONG CORRESPONDENCELIMITATION 1.g
Published claim language
“effecting a change in digital ownership following the transaction”
Plain-English technical meaning
Ownership record is updated, potentially via blockchain and/or smart-contract processing.
ELEMENT 1.g
Patent requirement
effecting a change in digital ownership following the transaction
Public evidence
NFT ownership transfer and smart-contract operations publicly described.
Technical interpretation
Final wording of the allowed claim will determine relevance of smart-contract detail.
Correspondence assessment
TECHNICAL CONFIRMATION REQUIREDAssessment classifications
Public material directly describes the relevant technical operation.
Multiple public sources demonstrate substantial technical correspondence.
The public architecture appears consistent with the patent element but additional technical information is required.
Public information does not establish every relevant technical limitation.
Patent Mapping Disclaimer
This presentation has been prepared for preliminary commercial and technical evaluation purposes. The analysis is based primarily on publicly available information and does not constitute a complete claim analysis, allegation of infringement, legal opinion or legal advice. References to technical correspondence indicate areas identified for further evaluation and should not be interpreted as a determination of infringement or legal liability. Certain technical operations cannot be established from public information and may require further confidential technical review. Patent prosecution status and claim scope should be independently confirmed with qualified patent counsel before reliance is placed upon this analysis.