CONFIDENTIAL PATENT POSITION REVIEW
PATENT POSITION18/856,095
Executive Overview

ILLUST TECHNICAL MAPPING

HJMT has reviewed publicly available information concerning the ILLUST platform against the technical architecture described in the patent position. The review is preliminary, is based on public material only, and is prepared to support a constructive commercial and technical conversation.

Patent Application 18/856,095 · US 2025/0245933 A1

7

Major technical elements reviewed.

Public evidence

ILLUST public evidence identified across the end-to-end architecture.

PATENT × ILLUSTPreliminary technical correspondence based on publicly available evidence

Patent

Location
Digital Asset
Map
Presence
AR
Marketplace
Ownership

ILLUST

Geospatial Registry
Digital Asset / NFT Placement
Global Map
Proof of Presence
AR Experience
Marketplace
Blockchain Ownership

Preliminary technical correspondence based on publicly available evidence. Areas of correspondence are identified for further evaluation only.

CLAIM-ELEMENT COVERAGE MAPSeven major technical elements

LOCATION

1.a
Patent
Physical / geographic position
ILLUST
Creators publicly described as able to anchor assets and AR experiences at physical-world positions.
STRONG

IL-002 · IL-003

ASSET

1.b
Patent
Digital asset association
ILLUST
GPS coordinates, geohashes, geofences and location anchors publicly described.
STRONG

IL-001 · IL-003

MAP

1.c
Patent
Map-based discovery
ILLUST
Google Maps-like interface and AR 'Mapplication' publicly described.
STRONG

IL-001 · IL-005

PRESENCE

1.d
Patent
Physical user location
ILLUST
Public material describes navigation toward assets and proof-of-presence functionality.
STRONG

IL-001 · IL-003

AR

1.e
Patent
AR access or interaction
ILLUST
Browser-based AR rendering of works at physical locations.
STRONG

IL-005 · IL-002

MARKETPLACE

1.f
Patent
Marketplace transaction
ILLUST
Marketplace, sale, bidding and purchase functions described in public terms.
STRONG

IL-004 · IL-001

OWNERSHIP

1.g
Patent
Digital ownership transaction
ILLUST
NFT ownership transfer and smart-contract operations publicly described.
CONFIRMATION REQUIRED

IL-004 · IL-001

Reading this map

  • DIRECT PUBLIC EVIDENCE — Public material directly describes the relevant technical operation.
  • STRONG CORRESPONDENCE — Multiple public sources demonstrate substantial technical correspondence.
  • REASONABLE CORRESPONDENCE — The public architecture appears consistent with the patent element but additional technical information is required.
  • TECHNICAL CONFIRMATION REQUIRED — Public information does not establish every relevant technical limitation.

Basis of this analysis

This is a preliminary mapping prepared from publicly available information. It identifies areas of technical correspondence and commercial relevance for further evaluation. It is not a claim chart, an allegation of infringement, or a legal opinion.

Architecture side by side

The patent architecture and the publicly documented ILLUST workflow are shown stage by stage. Corresponding stages are aligned horizontally.

Patent

Illust — publicly documented

1.a

Position selected

STAGE 1

Geospatial position / location anchor

1.b

Digital asset associated

STAGE 2

Digital asset / NFT placement

1.c

Map generated / presented

STAGE 3

Map / geospatial discovery interface

1.d

User location determined

STAGE 4

Presence / location functionality

1.e

AR asset accessed

STAGE 5

AR experience

1.f

Marketplace transaction

STAGE 6

Marketplace / purchase / bidding

1.g

Digital ownership / blockchain transfer

STAGE 7

Blockchain / smart-contract ownership

Preliminary technical correspondence based on publicly available information. No identity between the two systems is asserted.

Mapping scorecard — at a glance

Each classification below is derived from the evidence held in this review, not asserted independently of it.

1.a

Physical / geographic position

Creators publicly described as able to anchor assets and AR experiences at physical-world positions.

STRONG CORRESPONDENCE
1.b

Digital asset association

GPS coordinates, geohashes, geofences and location anchors publicly described.

STRONG CORRESPONDENCE
1.c

Map-based discovery

Google Maps-like interface and AR 'Mapplication' publicly described.

STRONG CORRESPONDENCE
1.d

Physical user location

Public material describes navigation toward assets and proof-of-presence functionality.

STRONG CORRESPONDENCE
1.e

AR access or interaction

Browser-based AR rendering of works at physical locations.

STRONG CORRESPONDENCE
1.f

Marketplace transaction

Marketplace, sale, bidding and purchase functions described in public terms.

STRONG CORRESPONDENCE
1.g

Digital ownership transaction

NFT ownership transfer and smart-contract operations publicly described.

TECHNICAL CONFIRMATION REQUIRED

Evidence classifications

DIRECT PUBLIC EVIDENCE

Public material directly describes the relevant technical operation.

STRONG CORRESPONDENCE

Multiple public sources demonstrate substantial technical correspondence.

REASONABLE CORRESPONDENCE

The public architecture appears consistent with the patent element but additional technical information is required.

TECHNICAL CONFIRMATION REQUIRED

Public information does not establish every relevant technical limitation.

Prosecution status

NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE — PROCEEDING TO GRANTED UNITED STATES PATENT

Patent position

Detailed evidence

Traceable evidence cards with source, date, URL and technical significance.

View detailed evidence

Commercial pathways

Acquisition, licensing and alternative strategic structures — all subject to negotiation.

Review pathways

Confidential Discussion

HJMT welcomes the opportunity to discuss the patent position with ILLUST and determine whether further technical, legal and commercial evaluation is appropriate.

HJMT

Patent Positioning & Commercialisation

Melbourne, Australia

Patent Mapping Disclaimer

This presentation has been prepared for preliminary commercial and technical evaluation purposes. The analysis is based primarily on publicly available information and does not constitute a complete claim analysis, allegation of infringement, legal opinion or legal advice. References to technical correspondence indicate areas identified for further evaluation and should not be interpreted as a determination of infringement or legal liability. Certain technical operations cannot be established from public information and may require further confidential technical review. Patent prosecution status and claim scope should be independently confirmed with qualified patent counsel before reliance is placed upon this analysis.