CONFIDENTIAL PATENT POSITION REVIEW
PATENT POSITION18/856,095
LEVEL 1 — EXECUTIVE
Conceptual Basis

THE TECHNICAL COMBINATION

This review is not concerned with the individual use of geolocation, augmented reality, maps, NFTs, blockchain or marketplaces. Each of those technologies is widely used. The analysis concerns the claimed combination, the relationships between those functions, and the sequence in which they operate.

Individual technologies entering the claimed orchestration

GEOLOCATION

DIGITAL ASSETS

MAP INTERFACE

PHYSICAL PRESENCE

AR

MARKETPLACE

BLOCKCHAIN

ORCHESTRATED TECHNICAL WORKFLOW

LOCATION-DEPENDENT DIGITAL ASSET DISCOVERY, INTERACTION AND TRANSACTION

The patent-positioning analysis focuses on the claimed technical combination and sequence of operations rather than ownership of individual underlying technologies.

Not the components

Geolocation, AR, maps, NFTs, blockchain and marketplaces are each common, established technologies in wide use.

The relationships

The analysis concerns how those functions are connected: asset bound to location, discovery bound to map, access conditioned on physical presence.

The sequence

The order in which the operations occur, ending in a marketplace transaction and a corresponding change in digital ownership.

Scope of the analysis

The patent-positioning analysis focuses on the claimed technical combination and sequence of operations rather than ownership of individual underlying technologies.

Patent Mapping Disclaimer

This presentation has been prepared for preliminary commercial and technical evaluation purposes. The analysis is based primarily on publicly available information and does not constitute a complete claim analysis, allegation of infringement, legal opinion or legal advice. References to technical correspondence indicate areas identified for further evaluation and should not be interpreted as a determination of infringement or legal liability. Certain technical operations cannot be established from public information and may require further confidential technical review. Patent prosecution status and claim scope should be independently confirmed with qualified patent counsel before reliance is placed upon this analysis.