CONFIDENTIAL PATENT POSITION REVIEW
PATENT POSITION18/856,095
Evidence

ILLUST EVIDENCE LIBRARY

Every mapping statement in this pathway is traceable to one or more of the evidence records below. Each record identifies its source, URL, dates, extract and the claim elements it supports.

Extracts summarise publicly published descriptions of platform capability. They are not admissions and must not be read as legal conclusions.

TIER 1 — ILLUST-owned sources

Official website, product and technical documentation, terms, privacy documentation, developer documentation and official announcements.

5 RECORD(S) IN THIS REVIEW

TIER 2 — Independent authoritative sources

USPTO and patent offices, corporate registries, reputable media, investor documentation and conference presentations.

0 RECORD(S) IN THIS REVIEW

TIER 3 — Secondary sources

Industry databases, aggregators, social media and third-party commentary.

0 RECORD(S) IN THIS REVIEW

Critical technical mapping in this pathway relies primarily on Tier 1, ILLUST-published sources.

IL-001TIER 1PRE-PRIORITY PUBLIC EVIDENCE — 2021DIRECT PUBLIC EVIDENCE

Illust — What is Illust Space?

Illust Space (company-published)

Original evidence date: 2021Last verified: 21 August 2026URL: https://illust.space/what-is-illust-space

Potential relevance to patentability or validity requires separate patent-attorney assessment. This chronology classification does not constitute a conclusion that the material is prior art against any patent claim.

“Company material publicly describes a Google Maps-like interface for locating digital assets, navigating physically toward an asset, GPS anchoring of works, wallet connection, importing NFTs, placement of assets on a map, dynamic smart contracts, an AR marketplace and NFT ownership transfer.”

Technical significance

Corresponds with the map-generation, physical-presence and marketplace concepts described in the patent architecture. Precise transaction architecture is not established by this page alone.

Relevant patent elements

1.b · Digital asset association1.c · Map-based discovery1.d · Physical user location1.f · Marketplace transaction1.g · Digital ownership transaction
VIEW SOURCE
IL-002TIER 1CURRENT PUBLIC EVIDENCEDIRECT PUBLIC EVIDENCE

Illust — Publishing in The Space

Illust Space (company-published)

Original evidence date: Not statedLast verified: 21 August 2026URL: https://illust.space/publishing-in-the-space

“Publicly describes deploying NFTs into the real world, a 'Wallet to World' publishing concept, support for Ethereum and Polygon assets, use of blockchain metadata, and AR publishing of the resulting work.”

Technical significance

Maps against the patent sequence in which an owner's digital asset is selected and virtually placed at a physical position.

Relevant patent elements

1.a · Physical / geographic position1.e · AR access or interaction
VIEW SOURCE
IL-003TIER 1CURRENT PUBLIC EVIDENCEDIRECT PUBLIC EVIDENCE

Illust — GeoSpatial Registry

Illust Space (company-published)

Original evidence date: Not statedLast verified: 21 August 2026URL: https://illust.space/geospatial-registry

“Publicly describes a global index of geofenced digital assets, cross-chain architecture, physical-world publishing, geohash-based indexing, location anchors, customised AR scenes, blockchain ownership verification, a global map, proof of presence and interoperability.”

Technical significance

The registry description is the strongest public correspondence with the spatial-placement and discovery layers of the patent architecture. Cross-chain transaction mechanics remain to be confirmed.

Relevant patent elements

1.a · Physical / geographic position1.b · Digital asset association1.d · Physical user location
VIEW SOURCE
IL-004TIER 1CURRENT PUBLIC EVIDENCEREASONABLE CORRESPONDENCE

Illust — Terms of Service

Illust Space (company-published)

Original evidence date: Not statedLast verified: 21 August 2026URL: https://illust.space/terms-of-service

“Publicly describes NFT minting, Ethereum usage, marketplace functionality, sale, bidding, purchase, smart-contract operations and digital ownership transfer.”

Technical significance

Terms describe the commercial layer at a contractual level. The underlying technical implementation of transfer and settlement is not established by the terms alone.

Relevant patent elements

1.f · Marketplace transaction1.g · Digital ownership transaction
VIEW SOURCE
IL-005TIER 1CURRENT PUBLIC EVIDENCEDIRECT PUBLIC EVIDENCE

Illust — Current Home Page

Illust Space (company-published)

Original evidence date: Not statedLast verified: 21 August 2026URL: https://illust.space/

“Publicly describes browser-based AR, digital content tied to physical locations, blockchain usage, an AR 'Mapplication', location-based proofs, claimable AR works and marketplace integrations.”

Technical significance

Current-state confirmation that the map, AR and location-proof functions remain publicly presented as active capability.

Relevant patent elements

1.c · Map-based discovery1.e · AR access or interaction
VIEW SOURCE

Evidence classifications

DIRECT PUBLIC EVIDENCE

Public material directly describes the relevant technical operation.

STRONG CORRESPONDENCE

Multiple public sources demonstrate substantial technical correspondence.

REASONABLE CORRESPONDENCE

The public architecture appears consistent with the patent element but additional technical information is required.

TECHNICAL CONFIRMATION REQUIRED

Public information does not establish every relevant technical limitation.

Patent Mapping Disclaimer

This presentation has been prepared for preliminary commercial and technical evaluation purposes. The analysis is based primarily on publicly available information and does not constitute a complete claim analysis, allegation of infringement, legal opinion or legal advice. References to technical correspondence indicate areas identified for further evaluation and should not be interpreted as a determination of infringement or legal liability. Certain technical operations cannot be established from public information and may require further confidential technical review. Patent prosecution status and claim scope should be independently confirmed with qualified patent counsel before reliance is placed upon this analysis.