CONFIDENTIAL PATENT POSITION REVIEW
PATENT POSITION18/856,095
Comparative Review

ILLUST AND DROPP AGAINST THE PATENT ARCHITECTURE

Each row records a technical concept in the patent architecture and the extent to which publicly available material evidences comparable functionality for each target. Classifications describe technical similarity only.

DIRECT PUBLIC EVIDENCESTRONG / POTENTIAL CORRESPONDENCENOT YET ESTABLISHEDEVIDENCE CONTRADICTS (USED SPARINGLY)
Technical conceptPatent architectureIllust — public evidenceDropp — public evidence
GeolocationDIRECTDIRECTDIRECT
Physical-world placementDIRECTDIRECTDIRECT
Digital assetsDIRECTDIRECTDIRECT
NFT architectureDIRECTDIRECTDIRECT
Map discoveryDIRECTDIRECTFURTHER EVIDENCE REQUIRED
AR renderingDIRECTDIRECTDIRECT
Physical presenceDIRECTDIRECTSTRONG
GeofenceSTRONGDIRECTFURTHER EVIDENCE REQUIRED
Digital ownershipDIRECTDIRECTFURTHER EVIDENCE REQUIRED
MarketplaceDIRECTSTRONGFURTHER EVIDENCE REQUIRED
TradingDIRECTSTRONGNOT ESTABLISHED
PurchaseDIRECTSTRONGNOT ESTABLISHED
Smart contractsSTRONGSTRONGFURTHER EVIDENCE REQUIRED
Ownership transferDIRECTSTRONGFURTHER EVIDENCE REQUIRED
Cross-chainSTRONGSTRONGNOT ESTABLISHED
Virtual landSTRONGFURTHER EVIDENCE REQUIREDDIRECT
Location-triggered experienceDIRECTDIRECTDIRECT
PRIMARY REVIEW

ILLUST SPACE / ILLUST AR

Publicly described physical-world AR infrastructure combining geolocation, digital assets, blockchain and marketplace functionality.

OPEN FULL REVIEW
PRIMARY REVIEW

DROPP GG / DROPP LAND / REBASE

Geo-location enabled NFT and spatial-metaverse architecture connecting virtual assets with real-world locations.

OPEN FULL REVIEW

This comparison is based solely on publicly available material reviewed to date. It is not a determination of infringement, and further evidence may change any classification shown above.