CONFIDENTIAL PATENT POSITION REVIEW
PATENT POSITION18/856,095
Claim Element Mapping

TECHNICAL CORRESPONDENCE, ELEMENT BY ELEMENT

Each claim element is set against publicly evidenced target functionality. This is a technical mapping framework prepared to support qualified patent-attorney review; it is not a claim chart, and no element is asserted as met.

PUBLISHED CLAIM 1 — TECHNICAL MAPPING

Mapping basis: publicly available claim language from US 2025/0245933 A1. Final allowed claim verification pending against the USPTO prosecution record. Source: built-in baseline (Published application text). Manage claim source.

Target
DIRECT PUBLIC EVIDENCESTRONG / POTENTIAL CORRESPONDENCENOT YET ESTABLISHEDEVIDENCE CONTRADICTS (USED SPARINGLY)
CLAIM 1 — independent

A computer-implemented method for providing a digital asset marketplace, comprising receiving a selection of a physical or geographic location, associating a digital asset with the selected location, generating a map identifying locations at which digital assets may be viewed, determining that a user device is physically present at or within a defined area of the location, causing the digital asset to be displayed in augmented reality in combination with the real-world environment, and enabling the digital asset to be offered for purchase or trade with a corresponding change in digital ownership.

Technical interpretation

A seller or owner designates a selectable real-world position, space or physical object reference within the system.

PROVISIONAL — PENDING ALLOWED CLAIM SET

Publicly evidenced function

Creators publicly described as able to anchor assets and AR experiences at physical-world positions.

STRONG CORRESPONDENCEHigh

Evidence gap — Exact selection UI and permitted location types to be confirmed.

Legal review — Pending allowed claims

Mapping candidate is strong on public material; construction of 'selectable space' required.

Nothing on this page constitutes a legal opinion on infringement, validity or enforceability. Any conclusion depends upon the final allowed claims, claim construction, prosecution history and applicable U.S. patent law, and requires review by qualified U.S. patent counsel.