PUBLISHED CLAIM MAPPING — ALLOWED CLAIM VERIFICATION PENDING
A claim operates as a chain. Every element must be present for correspondence to exist. This page presents the chain as a technical structure — not as a legal conclusion about infringement.
Mapping basis
The technical analysis presented here uses the publicly available claims of US 2025/0245933 A1. Final allowed claim language will be incorporated following verification against the USPTO prosecution record. Published claim mapping and final allowed claim verification are treated as separate matters throughout this review.
Location selection
PUBLICLY EVIDENCEDClaim language as supplied
Loading claim source register…
SOURCE: Baseline — published application text (built in) · PUBLISHED APPLICATION TEXT · PUBLISHED CLAIM MAPPING — ALLOWED CLAIM VERIFICATION PENDING
Evidence relied on
Selection of a physical or geo-located position for a digital asset.
REVIEW PRIORITY ELEMENT
Specific ownership sequence
The precise order of ownership state changes is not publicly established.
REVIEW PRIORITY ELEMENT
Cross-chain implementation
Described publicly at a conceptual level; implementation detail not established.
Illumination reflects publicly available evidence only. Element-level correspondence is a technical observation for legal review, not a conclusion of infringement.
| Target | A Location selection | B Digital asset association | C Map generation | D Physical user location | E AR viewing | F Marketplace action | G Blockchain / ownership transaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILLUST | |||||||
| DROPP / REBASE | |||||||
| FUTURE TARGETS |
Click any cell with recorded sources to open the underlying evidence.
REVIEW PRIORITY ELEMENT
Specific ownership sequence
The precise order of ownership state changes is not publicly established.
ILLUST · DROPP
REVIEW PRIORITY ELEMENT
Cross-chain implementation
Described publicly at a conceptual level; implementation detail not established.
ILLUST
WHAT WE KNOW · WHAT WE INFER · WHAT WE CANNOT PROVE
WHAT WE KNOW
Directly evidenced on the public record.
- Digital assets can be geolocated to real-world positions.
- Augmented reality is used to view placed assets.
- Blockchain infrastructure is used.
- NFTs held in a wallet can be published into physical space.
- Marketplace functionality is publicly described.
- Ownership transfer is publicly referenced.
WHAT WE INFER
Reasonable technical inference only.
- Some form of backend location verification likely occurs.
- Wallet ownership may influence asset-management permissions.
- Geospatial registry data is likely used within the AR rendering workflow.
- Geofence boundaries are likely evaluated server-side before rendering.
WHAT WE CANNOT PROVE
Requires disclosure, testing or discovery.
- Exact transaction sequence.
- Precise smart-contract architecture.
- Ownership state changes.
- Cross-chain transfer mechanics.
- Server-side processing.
- Current U.S. activity.
- Relationship between frontend and blockchain infrastructure.
Scope
Patent specification disclosure and issued claim coverage are not synonymous. Final scope requires claim-specific legal analysis.