CONFIDENTIAL PATENT POSITION REVIEW
PATENT POSITION18/856,095
Claim Element Analysis

THE CHAIN, ELEMENT BY ELEMENT

A claim operates as a chain. Every element must be present for correspondence to exist. This page presents the chain as a technical structure — not as a legal conclusion about infringement.

Claim element chain
Illuminate target
A

Location selection

PUBLICLY EVIDENCED

Claim language as supplied

Loading claim source register…

SOURCE: Baseline — published application text (built in) · PUBLISHED APPLICATION TEXT · BASELINE — FINAL ALLOWED CLAIM SET NOT YET SUPPLIED

Evidence relied on

Selection of a physical or geo-located position for a digital asset.

REVIEW PRIORITY ELEMENT

Specific ownership sequence

The precise order of ownership state changes is not publicly established.

REVIEW PRIORITY ELEMENT

Cross-chain implementation

Described publicly at a conceptual level; implementation detail not established.

Illumination reflects publicly available evidence only. Element-level correspondence is a technical observation for legal review, not a conclusion of infringement.

Correspondence heatmap
Target

A

Location selection

B

Digital asset association

C

Map generation

D

Physical user location

E

AR viewing

F

Marketplace action

G

Blockchain / ownership transaction

ILLUST
DROPP / REBASE
FUTURE TARGETS
Directly evidenced Potential correspondence Unknown Contradictory evidence

Click any cell with recorded sources to open the underlying evidence.

Review priority elements

REVIEW PRIORITY ELEMENT

Specific ownership sequence

The precise order of ownership state changes is not publicly established.

ILLUST · DROPP

REVIEW PRIORITY ELEMENT

Cross-chain implementation

Described publicly at a conceptual level; implementation detail not established.

ILLUST

Evidence standard separation

WHAT WE KNOW · WHAT WE INFER · WHAT WE CANNOT PROVE

WHAT WE KNOW

Directly evidenced on the public record.

  • Digital assets can be geolocated to real-world positions.
  • Augmented reality is used to view placed assets.
  • Blockchain infrastructure is used.
  • NFTs held in a wallet can be published into physical space.
  • Marketplace functionality is publicly described.
  • Ownership transfer is publicly referenced.

WHAT WE INFER

Reasonable technical inference only.

  • Some form of backend location verification likely occurs.
  • Wallet ownership may influence asset-management permissions.
  • Geospatial registry data is likely used within the AR rendering workflow.
  • Geofence boundaries are likely evaluated server-side before rendering.

WHAT WE CANNOT PROVE

Requires disclosure, testing or discovery.

  • Exact transaction sequence.
  • Precise smart-contract architecture.
  • Ownership state changes.
  • Cross-chain transfer mechanics.
  • Server-side processing.
  • Current U.S. activity.
  • Relationship between frontend and blockchain infrastructure.

Scope

Patent specification disclosure and issued claim coverage are not synonymous. Final scope requires claim-specific legal analysis.